5 Comments
User's avatar
Joseph Deitzer's avatar

There is at least a loose connection, for me, between "progress" and "originality". If that's so, and we are to be in an "after progress" world, I suppose the question is how to be original while avoiding being individualistic. It seems like the algorithm, the panopticon, or whatever you want to call it, is especially effective at creating both unoriginal and individualistic people.

E.J. LaRow's avatar

True. It’s certainly a battle. These were a bit of some loose thoughts, but I would press that virtue is a better guide. I’m not sure “original” should mean “self-expression.” It’s somewhat like how people say “freedom” and think it is “do whatever you want to do.” I haven’t fully formed on this, but I think you’re right to wonder.

William Sackett's avatar

Because if something you wrote is commercially or even reviewed as a success, maybe something I write that's similar will also be successful. Money money money, money!

Lyn Ferreira's avatar

Eddie this is so good. I wrote a note on the struggle of originality and the algorithm this morning, then read your essay. The feedback-loop system we've created, where we're more interested in dancing for applause and keeping the applause going, rather than actually thinking and creating original work is fascinating to me. I think much of this has to do with our cultural emphasis on ease. The muscles that would have been developed in generations past are now all too easily atrophied.

What helps you keep yours strong??? Must know.